Volume 6 | Issue 2 | July-December 2021 | Page 01-02 | Anshu Shekhar, Sachin Tapasvi

DOI:10.13107/aja.2021.v06i02.026


Author: Anshu Shekhar [1], Sachin Tapasvi [2]

[1] Sushrut OrthoPlastic Clinic, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India.
[2] The Orthopaedic Speciality Clinic, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

Address of Correspondence:

Dr. Anshu Shekhar,
Consultant, Sushrut OrthoPlastic Clinic, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India.
E-mail: dr.anshushekhar@gmail.com


Editorial

Asian Journal of Arthroscopy completes 5 years of publication with this issue. This feat could only be achieved because of the unflinching support from all our authors, reviewers and above all, the readers. In all our previous issues, we have dealt with specific areas and pathologies which can be treated by arthroscopy. The knee joint has received most attention because it the most common joint to be injured and be treated as well. However, any
talk of knee preservation is incomplete without acknowledging the art and science of osteotomy. This issue is dedicated to discussing the various aspects of a modern knee osteotomy for preserving the knee joint because it is indeed the final frontier.

Osteotomy surgery is a proven method of knee joint preservation by correcting mal-alignment in the coronal and sagittal planes [1]. It has been used to treat knee osteoarthritis by correcting varus or valgus mal-alignment since a very long time and with good results [2]. However, the science and art of osteotomy has evolved significantly over the last decade or so and everything is not so simple about a high tibial osteotomy (HTO) anymore. This has made osteotomy more predictable and safer, while expanding the indications and applications. One major ‘expanded’ indication has been to use osteotomy to treat ligament instabilities of the knee. This has been a force multiplier for ligament surgeons, who can achieve greater success with their soft-tissue reconstruction [3]. Perhaps the most remarkable progress has been made in planning an osteotomy. The use of digital planning techniques and specialized software for defining the deformity and correction has made osteotomy planning more reproducible and accurate [4, 5]. However, clinical examination cannot be given a miss in spite of any sophisticated radiological planning tool. Assessment of the soft-tissue laxity has to be considered in the surgical plan because this is an important cause of over-correction [6].

Medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) remains by far the most commonly performed surgery to correct malalignment around the knee for any indication. A close wedge or dome osteotomy are less frequently performed but have their place. Techniques of these surgeries are also evolving, the most important of which are performing a biplanar osteotomy and use of angle-stable locked plates for fixation. Both these provide definite benefits in terms of biology and biomechanics, thus permitting early mobilization and weight bearing [7, 8]. Another simple but remarkable innovation has been use of a K wire as a hinge protection tool. This has reduced the incidence of lateral hinge fractures by increasing the stiffness of hinge by about 880% and allowing early healing of the osteotomy [9, 10]. Even in cases of varus osteoarthritis with severe deformity, the utility of a double-level osteotomy to prevent joint line obliquity and provide good results has been demonstrated [11]. Another area of interest now are sagittal tibial osteotomies, especially the anterior closing wedge to reduce the posterior tibial slope in the setting of repeated failures of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction [12].

As regards the use of technology for performing osteotomies, navigation has been used for quite some time. Although navigated HTO has yielded better precision and accuracy of alignment correction, it has not translated to better clinical outcomes [13]. The newest technological marvel in osteotomy surgery is the use of patient-specific cutting jigs and implants. This is a promising new avenue with good clinical results reported in the short-term without an increased risk of specific or non-specific complications [14]. In spite of everything, some patients will eventually require a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for end-stage disease. The long-term survivorship of a TKA after HTO has been reported as 97% with a 3% revision rate for instability [15]. The survival drops to 88% after a distal femoral osteotomy when 6% revisions are due to instability [16]. These numbers are for patients who underwent osteotomies when the philosophy was still not refined. With better osteotomy technique and respect to ligament balancing, the TKA survivorship should also improve in future.

All these issues related to planning, execution and performance of a knee osteotomy have been dealt with in great detail and up to date information in this issue. We do hope that the wealth of knowledge contributed by the stalwarts of osteotomy surgery will be loved and appreciated by all our readers. The bone always wins and anybody willing to preserve a knee joint must have the weapon of osteotomy in their armamentarium.


References

1. Zampogna B, Vasta S, Papalia R. Patient Evaluation and Indications for Osteotomy Around the Knee. Clin Sports Med. 2019;38(3):305-315. doi:10.1016/j.csm.2019.02.011
2. Peng H, Ou A, Huang X, et al. Osteotomy Around the Knee: The Surgical Treatment of Osteoarthritis. Orthop Surg. 2021;13(5):1465-1473. doi:10.1111/os.13021
3. Tischer T, Paul J, Pape D, et al. The Impact of Osseous Malalignment and Realignment Procedures in Knee Ligament Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Clinical Evidence. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017;5(3):2325967117697287. doi:10.1177/2325967117697287
4. Elson DW, Petheram TG, Dawson MJ. High reliability in digital planning of medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy, using Miniaci’s method. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23(7):2041-2048. doi:10.1007/s00167-014-2920-x.
5. Schröter S, Ihle C, Mueller J, Lobenhoffer P, Stöckle U, van Heerwaarden R. Digital planning of high tibial osteotomy. Interrater reliability by using two different software. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(1):189-196. doi:10.1007/s00167-012-2114-3
6. Park JG, Kim JM, Lee BS, Lee SM, Kwon OJ, Bin SI. Increased preoperative medial and lateral laxity is a predictor of overcorrection in open wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020;28(10):3164-3172. doi:10.1007/s00167-019-05805-8.
7. Pape D, Lorbach O, Schmitz C, et al. Effect of a biplanar osteotomy on primary stability following high tibial osteotomy: a biomechanical cadaver study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18(2):204-211. doi:10.1007/s00167-009-0929-3
8. Koh, YG., Lee, JA., Lee, HY. et al. Design optimization of high tibial osteotomy plates using finite element analysis for improved biomechanical effect. J Orthop Surg Res 14, 219 (2019). doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1269-8.
9. Gulagaci F, Jacquet C, Ehlinger M, et al. A protective hinge wire, intersecting the osteotomy plane, can reduce the occurrence of perioperative hinge fractures in medial opening wedge osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020;28(10):3173-3182. doi:10.1007/s00167-019-05806-7
10. Dessyn E, Sharma A, Donnez M, et al. Adding a protective K-wire during opening high tibial osteotomy increases lateral hinge resistance to fracture. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020;28(3):751-758. doi:10.1007/s00167-019-05404-7
11. Schröter S, Nakayama H, Yoshiya S, Stöckle U, Ateschrang A, Gruhn J. Development of the double level osteotomy in severe varus osteoarthritis showed good outcome by preventing oblique joint line. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019;139(4):519-527. doi:10.1007/s00402-018-3068-9
12. Vadhera AS, Knapik DM, Gursoy S, et al. Current Concepts in Anterior Tibial Closing Wedge Osteotomies for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficient Knees. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2021;14(6):485-492. doi:10.1007/s12178-021-09729-0
13. Wu ZP, Zhang P, Bai JZ, et al. Comparison of navigated and conventional high tibial osteotomy for the treatment of osteoarthritic knees with varus deformity: A meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2018;55:211-219. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.03.024
14. Chaouche S, Jacquet C, Fabre-Aubrespy M, et al. Patient-specific cutting guides for open-wedge high tibial osteotomy: safety and accuracy analysis of a hundred patients continuous cohort. Int Orthop. 2019;43(12):2757-2765. doi:10.1007/s00264-019-04372-4
15. Chalmers BP, Limberg AK, Tibbo ME, Perry KI, Pagnano MW, Abdel MP. Total Knee Arthroplasty After High Tibial Osteotomy Results in Excellent Long-Term Survivorship and Clinical Outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019;101(11):970-978. doi:10.2106/JBJS.18.01060
16. Chalmers BP, Limberg AK, Athey AG, Perry KI, Pagnano MW, Abdel MP. Total knee arthroplasty after distal femoral osteotomy long-term survivorship and clinical outcomes. Bone Joint J. 2019;101-B(6):660-666. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.101B6.BJJ-2018-1334.R2


How to Cite this article: Shekhar A, Tapasvi S | Osteotomy: The Final Frontier in Knee Preservation | Asian Journal of Arthroscopy | July-December 2021; 6(2): 01-02.


(Abstract Text HTML)      (Download PDF)


Volume 6 | Issue 2 | July-December 2021 | Page 54-57 | Vijay C. Bose , Kalaivanan Kanniyan

DOI:10.13107/aja.2021.v06i02.035


Author: Vijay C. Bose [1], Kalaivanan Kanniyan [1]

[1] Asian-Joint Reconstruction Institute (AJRI), SIMS, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Address of Correspondence:

Dr. Vijay Bose,
Asian-Joint Reconstruction Institute (AJRI), SIMS, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: bose5vijay@hotmail.com


Abstract

Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA), post High Tibial osteotomy (HTO) continues to be an enigma with published reports of both good and suboptimal results in comparison to TKA for osteoarthritis (OA). The surgeons performing HTO must always employ TKR friendly techniques so that it is easy to apply the correct principles while conversion into TKA and have a very good results contradictory to the traditional historical conclusion. The bug bear of HTO is the post slope where common errors can occur even when performed by experienced surgeons. The norm is usually for the post slope to increase with the medial open wedge and for the post slope to decrease with lateral Closed wedge. The golden rule in Post HTO TKA conversion is to start off by resecting less bone. This is done so that inadvertent joint line variation from ideal is avoided. We then do extension space management by using various thickness of spacer hemi blocks. However individual cases may be different. Reliable results can be achieved in post HTO TKR if good planning and careful execution of the potentially problematic steps are undertaken. Residual soft tissue laxity necessitating increased constraint is more common in Post HTO TKR than in TKR for OA.
Keywords: Total Knee Replacement, High Tibial Osteotomy, Osteoarthritis


References

1. Gao, L., Madry, H., Chugaev, D.V. et al. Advances in modern osteotomies around the knee. J EXP ORTOP 6, 9 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40634-019-0177-5
2. Rand J, Neyret P (2005) ISAKOS meeting on the management of osteoarthritis of the knee prior to total knee arthroplasty. In: ISAKOS congress.
3. Hui C et al, Long-term survival of high tibial osteotomy for medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee. Am J Sports Med. 2011 Jan;39(1):64-70. doi: 10.1177/0363546510377445. Epub 2010 Sep 10. PMID: 20833833.
4. Song, Sang Jun et al. “Conversion Total Knee Arthroplasty after Failed High Tibial Osteotomy.” Knee surgery & related research vol. 28,2 (2016): 89-98. doi:10.5792/ksrr.2016.28.2.89
5. Efe T, Ahmed G, Heyse TJ, Boudriot U, Timmesfeld N, Fuchs-Winkelmann S, Ishaque B, Lakemeier S, Schofer MD. Closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy: survival and risk factor analysis at long-term follow up. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011;12:46.
6. Hoemann C et al (2011) International cartilage repair society (ICRS) recommended guidelines for histological endpoints for cartilage repair studies in animal models and clinical trials. Cartilage 2:153–172.
7. Krych AJ, Hevesi M, Desai VS, Camp CL, Stuart MJ, Saris DBF (2018) Learning from failure in cartilage repair surgery: an analysis of the mode of failure of primary procedures in consecutive cases at a tertiary referral center. Orthop J Sports Med 6:2325967118773041.
8. Cross M, et al. The global burden of hip and knee osteoarthritis: estimates from the global burden of disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis 2014;73:1323–30.
9. Hofmann AA, Kane KR. Total knee arthroplasty after high tibial osteotomy. Orthopedics 1994; 17(9): 887-90
10. Vince KG, Abdeen A, Sugimori T. The unstable total knee arthroplasty: Causes and cures. J Arthroplasty 2006; 21(4)(Suppl. 1): 44-9.
11. Pritsch M, Fitzgerald RH Jr, Bryan RS. Surgical treatment of ligamentous instability after total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1984; 102(3): 154-8.
12. Wataru Kusano et al ., Total Knee Arthroplasty Conversion after Open-wedge High Tibial Osteotomy. The open orthopedics journal, 2021,15: 53-56
13. Noda T, Yasuda S, Nagano K, Takahara Y, Namba Y, Inoue H. Clinico-radiological study of total knee arthroplasty after high tibial osteotomy. J Orthop Sci 2000; 5(1): 25-36.
14. Gebhard F, Krettek C, Hufner T, Grützner PA, Stockle U, Imhoff AB, Lorenz S, Ljungqvist J, Keppler P; AO CSEG. Reliability of computer-assisted surgery as an intraoperative ruler in navigated high tibial osteotomy. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011;131:297-302
15. Kim HJ, Kim YG, Min SG, Kyung HS. Total knee arthroplasty conversion after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy: A report of three cases. Knee. 2016 Dec;23(6):1164-1167. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2016.06.010. Epub 2016 Oct 31. PMID: 27810432.
16. Wataru Kusano et al ., Total Knee Arthroplasty Conversion after Open-wedge High Tibial Osteotomy. The open orthopedics journal, 2021,15: 53-56
17. Erak S, Naudie D, MacDonald SJ, McCalden RW, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB. Total knee arthroplasty following medial opening wedge tibial osteotomy: Technical issues early clinical radiological results. Knee 2011; 18(6): 499-504.
18. Billings et al. High Tibial Osteotomy with a Calibrated Osteotomy Guide, Rigid Internal Fixation, and Early Motion. Long-Term Follow-up*, The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery: January 2000 – Volume 82 – Issue 1 – p 70-9.
19. Meding JB, Keating EM, Ritter MA, Faris PM. Total knee arthroplasty after high tibial osteotomy. A comparison study in patients who had bilateral total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000 Sep;82(9):1252-9. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200009000-00005. PMID: 11005516.
20. Sun X, Wang J, Su Z. A meta-analysis of total knee arthroplasty following high tibial osteotomy versus primary total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020 Apr;140(4):527-535. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03333-6. Epub 2020 Jan 30. PMID: 32002662; PMCID: PMC7109181.
21. Windsor RE, Insall JN, Vince KG. Technical considerations of total knee arthroplasty after proximal tibial osteotomy. JBone Joint Surg Am. 1988;70(4):547–55. Apr.
22. Katz M M, Hungerford D S, Krackow K A, Lennox D W. Results of total knee arthroplasty after failed proximal tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1987; 69(2)225–33
23. Rozkydal et al, Total knee replacement following high tibial osteotomy]. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2003;70(3):158-63. Czech. PMID: 12882099.
24. Parvizi J, Hanssen AD, Spangehl MJ. Total knee arthroplasty following proximal tibial osteotomy: risk factors for failure. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Mar;86(3):474-9. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200403000-00003. PMID: 14996871.
25. Codie A. Primeau et al, Total knee replacement after high tibial osteotomy: time-to-event analysis and predictors, CMAJ Feb 2021, 193 (5) E158-E166; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.200934


How to Cite this article: Bose VC, Kanniyan K | Total Knee Replacement After High Tibial Osteotomy | Asian Journal of Arthroscopy | July-December 2021; 6(2): 54-57.


(Abstract Text HTML)      (Download PDF)


Volume 6 | Issue 2 | July-December 2021 | Page 46-53 | Ravi T Rudraraju , Jobe Shatrov , Brett A Fritsch

DOI:10.13107/aja.2021.v06i02.034


Author: Ravi T Rudraraju [1], Jobe Shatrov [1], Brett A Fritsch [1]

[1] Department of Orthopaedics, Sydney Orthopaedic Research Institute, Chatswood NSW, Australia.

Address of Correspondence:

Dr. Brett Fritsch,
Orthopaedic Surgeon, Sydney Orthopaedic Research Institute, Chatswood NSW, Australia.
E-mail: brett@brettfritsch.com.au


Abstract

Osteotomies around the knee are done to treat unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis, address instability and to correct the deformity. Careful selection of patient and preoperatively planning the target alignment are the key to achieve optimal results. There are multiple types of osteotomies with varying complication rates for each procedure. Opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO) is the commonly performed osteotomy with an incidence of complications ranging from 1.9% to 55%. Closed wedge HTO has complication rate of around 10 to 34% and higher complication rates (19 to 70%) are reported with distal femoral osteotomy. Complications are broadly classified into general and osteotomy specific complications, and osteotomy specific complications can be further subdivided into failure of effect, complications of the osteotomy itself, and complications of the implant.
This paper presents an overview of the complications of common osteotomies around the knee, predominantly high tibial and distal femoral osteotomy, and the approaches and techniques the surgeon can use to minimise their frequency and severity.
Keywords: High Tibial Osteotomy, Medial Closed Wedge HTO, Lateral Closed Wedge HTO, Distal Femoral Osteotomy, Complications after Osteotomy


References

1. King A, Wall O. Osteotomies around the knee. Orthop Trauma. 2014 Dec 1;28(6):388–95.
2. Vena G, D’Adamio S, Amendola A. Complications of osteotomies about the knee. Vol. 21, Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review. 2013. p. 113–20.
3. Naudie D, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Bourne TJ. The Install Award. Survivorship of the high tibial valgus osteotomy. A 10- to -22-year followup study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999 Oct;(367):18–27.
4. Aglietti P, Buzzi R, Vena LM, Baldini A, Mondaini A. High tibial valgus osteotomy for medial gonarthrosis: a 10- to 21-year study. J Knee Surg. 2003 Jan;16(1):21–6.
5. Sun H, Zhou L, Li F, Duan J. Comparison between Closing-Wedge and Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy in Patients with Medial Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Knee Surg. 2017 Feb 1;30(2):158–65.
6. Edgerton BC, Mariani EM, Morrey BF. Distal femoral varus osteotomy for painful genu valgum. A five-to-11-year follow-up study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993 Mar;(288):263–9.
7. Magyar G, Toksvig-Larsen S, Alkstedt J, Lindstrand A, Nilsson LT, Andersen R, et al. Frequent complications in distal femoral osteotomy: a retrospective 8 year multicenter follow-up. Chir Organi Mov. 1999;84(1):19–26.
8. Ramanathan D, Keudell A Von, Minas T, Gomoll AH. Survivorship and Complications of the Distal Femoral Osteotomy. Vol. 2, Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 2014.
9. Luceri F, Tamini J, Ferrua P, Ricci D, Batailler C, Lustig S, et al. Total knee arthroplasty after distal femoral osteotomy: a systematic review and current concepts. SICOT-J. 2020;6:35.
10. Kim YC, Yang J-H, Kim HJ, Tawonsawatruk T, Chang YS, Lee JS, et al. Distal Femoral Varus Osteotomy for Valgus Arthritis of the Knees: Systematic Review of Open versus Closed Wedge Osteotomy. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2018 Mar;30(1):3–16.
11. Cotter EJ, Gowd AK, Bohl DD, Getgood A, Cole BJ, Frank RM. Medical Comorbidities and Functional Dependent Living Are Independent Risk Factors for Short-Term Complications Following Osteotomy Procedures about the Knee. Cartilage. 2020 Oct;11(4):423–30.
12. Martin R, Birmingham TB, Willits K, Litchfield R, Lebel ME, Giffin JR. Adverse event rates and classifications in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(5):1118–26.
13. Spahn G. Complications in high tibial (medial opening wedge) osteotomy. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2004;124(10):649–53.
14. Bauer T, Hardy P, Lemoine J, Finlayson DF, Tranier S, Lortat-Jacob A. Drop foot after high tibial osteotomy: A prospective study of aetiological factors. Vol. 13, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2005. p. 23–33.
15. Song EK, Seon JK, Park SJ, Jeong MS, K Seon PJ, Surgeon J Park OS, et al. The complications of high tibial osteotomy CLOSING-VERSUS OPENING-WEDGE METHODS. J Bone Jt Surg [Br]. 2010;92(9):92–1245.
16. Anagnostakos K, Mosser P, Kohn D. Infections after high tibial osteotomy. Vol. 21, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2013. p. 161–9.
17. Smith TO, Sexton D, Mitchell P, Hing CB. Opening- or closing-wedged high tibial osteotomy: A meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes. Vol. 18, Knee. 2011. p. 361–8.
18. Gao L, Madry H, Chugaev D V., Denti M, Frolov A, Burtsev M, et al. Advances in modern osteotomies around the knee: Report on the Association of Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, Orthopaedic surgery, Rehabilitation (ASTAOR) Moscow International Osteotomy Congress 2017. Vol. 6, Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2019.
19. Parihar M, Singh T, Shah L. How to obtain a non-digital Full-length lower limb Radiographs using regular X-ray plates. Vol. 1, Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports. 2011. p. 36–8.
20. Vasconcellos David A.and Giffin JR and AA. Avoiding and Managing Complications in Osteotomies of the Knee. In: Meislin Robert J.and Halbrecht J, editor. Complications in Knee and Shoulder Surgery: Management and Treatment Options for the Sports Medicine Orthopedist [Internet]. London: Springer London; 2009. p. 115–32. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-203-0_7
21. Matsushita T, Watanabe S, Araki D, Nagai K, Hoshino Y, Kanzaki N, et al. Differences in preoperative planning for high-tibial osteotomy between the standing and supine positions. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2021 Dec 1;33(1).
22. Marx RG, Grimm P, Lillemoe KA, Robertson CM, Ayeni OR, Lyman S, et al. Reliability of lower extremity alignment measurement using radiographs and PACS. Knee Surgery, Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011 Oct;19(10):1693–8.
23. Yazdanpanah O, Mobarakeh MK, Nakhaei M, Baneshi MR. Comparison of Double and Single Leg Weight-Bearing. 2017;174:174–80.
24. Specogna A V, Birmingham TB, Hunt MA, Jones IC, Jenkyn TR, Fowler PJ, et al. Radiographic measures of knee alignment in patients with varus gonarthrosis: effect of weightbearing status and associations with dynamic joint load. Am J Sports Med. 2007 Jan;35(1):65–70.
25. Fujisawa Y, Masuhara K, Shiomi S. The effect of high tibial osteotomy on osteoarthritis of the knee. An arthroscopic study of 54 knee joints. Orthop Clin North Am. 1979 Jul;10(3):585–608.
26. Schallberger A, Jacobi M, Wahl P, Maestretti G, Jakob RP. High tibial valgus osteotomy in unicompartmental medial osteoarthritis of the knee: a retrospective follow-up study over 13-21 years. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011 Jan;19(1):122–7.
27. Bode G, von Heyden J, Pestka J, Schmal H, Salzmann G, Südkamp N, et al. Prospective 5-year survival rate data following open-wedge valgus high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Jul;23(7):1949–55.
28. Laprade RF, Spiridonov SI, Nystrom LM, Jansson KS. Prospective outcomes of young and middle-aged adults with medial compartment osteoarthritis treated with a proximal tibial opening wedge osteotomy. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg Off Publ Arthrosc Assoc North Am Int Arthrosc Assoc. 2012 Mar;28(3):354–64.
29. De Neve F, Braems B, Holvoet M, De Scheerder M-A, Arnout N, Victor J. Return to sport and work after medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy : a case series. Acta Orthop Belg. 2021 Mar;87(1):117–24.
30. Kuriyama S, Watanabe M, Nakamura S, Nishitani K, Sekiguchi K, Tanaka Y, et al. Classical target coronal alignment in high tibial osteotomy demonstrates validity in terms of knee kinematics and kinetics in a computer model. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 May;28(5):1568–78.
31. Noyes FR, Goebel SX, West J. Opening wedge tibial osteotomy: The 3-triangle method to correct axial alignment and tibial slope. Am J Sports Med. 2005 Mar;33(3):378–87.
32. Song SJ, Bae DK. Computer-assisted navigation in high tibial osteotomy. Vol. 8, CiOS Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery. Korean Orthopaedic Association; 2016. p. 349–57.
33. Akamatsu Y, Mitsugi N, Mochida Y, Taki N, Kobayashi H, Takeuchi R, et al. Navigated opening wedge high tibial osteotomy improves intraoperative correction angle compared with conventional method. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012 Mar;20(3):586–93.
34. Jacquet C, Sharma A, Fabre M, Ehlinger M, Argenson J-N, Parratte S, et al. Patient-specific high-tibial osteotomy’s “cutting-guides” decrease operating time and the number of fluoroscopic images taken after a Brief Learning Curve. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Sep;28(9):2854–62.
35. Munier M, Donnez M, Ollivier M, Flecher X, Chabrand P, Argenson J-N, et al. Can three-dimensional patient-specific cutting guides be used to achieve optimal correction for high tibial osteotomy? Pilot study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 Apr;103(2):245–50.
36. Han SB, Choi JH, Mahajan A, Shin YS. Incidence and Predictors of Lateral Hinge Fractures Following Medial Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy Using Locking Plate System: Better Performance of Computed Tomography Scans. J Arthroplasty. 2019 May 1;34(5):846–51.
37. Takeuchi R, Ishikawa H, Kumagai K, Yamaguchi Y, Chiba N, Akamatsu Y, et al. Fractures around the lateral cortical hinge after a medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy: A new classification of lateral hinge fracture. Arthrosc – J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 2012 Jan;28(1):85–94.
38. Kang K-T, Koh Y-G, Lee J-A, Lee JJ, Kwon SK. Biomechanical effect of a lateral hinge fracture for a medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: finite element study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Feb;15(1):63.
39. Jung G-H, Lee K-H, Wang L. Three-dimensional analysis of lateral cortical hinge in medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy: A computational simulation study of adult cadavers. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2020;28(3):2309499020959172.
40. Nakamura R, Komatsu N, Fujita K, Kuroda K, Takahashi M, Omi R, et al. Appropriate hinge position for prevention of unstable lateral hinge fracture in open wedge high tibial osteotomy. Bone Jt J. 2017;99(10):1313–31.
41. Ogawa H, Matsumoto K, Akiyama H. The prevention of a lateral hinge fracture as a complication of a medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: a case control study. Bone Joint J. 2017 Jul;99-B(7):887–93.
42. Boström A, Amin AK, Macpherson GJ, Pankaj P, Scott CEH. Hinge location and apical drill holes in opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: A finite element analysis. J Orthop Res. 2021 Mar 1;39(3):628–36.
43. Dessyn E, Sharma A, Donnez M, Chabrand P, Ehlinger M, Argenson J-N, et al. Adding a protective K-wire during opening high tibial osteotomy increases lateral hinge resistance to fracture. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Mar;28(3):751–8.
44. Miller BS, Downie B, McDonough EB, Wojtys EM. Complications After Medial Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy. Arthrosc – J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 2009 Jun;25(6):639–46.
45. de Mello Junior WA, Arruda LRP, Coluccini AM, da Silva Nunes RP, Pedro M do AC, de Souza MR, et al. COMPLICATIONS FOLLOWING MEDIAL OPENING WEDGE OSTEOTOMY OF THE KNEE: RETROSPECTIVE STUDY. Rev Bras Ortop. 2011 Jan;46(1):64–8.
46. Pearson RG, Clement RGE, Edwards KL, Scammell BE. Do smokers have greater risk of delayed and non-union after fracture, osteotomy and arthrodesis? A systematic review with meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2016 Nov;6(11):e010303.
47. Tunggal JAW, Higgins GA, Waddell JP. Complications of closing wedge high tibial osteotomy. Vol. 34, International Orthopaedics. 2010. p. 255–61.
48. Gaasbeek RDA, Welsing RTC, Verdonschot N, Rijnberg WJ, Van Loon CJM, Van Kampen A. Accuracy and initial stability of open- and closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy: A cadaveric RSA study. Knee Surgery, Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005 Nov;13(8):689–94.
49. Hankemeier S, Hufner T, Wang G, Kendoff D, Zeichen J, Zheng G, et al. Navigated open-wedge high tibial osteotomy: Advantages and disadvantages compared to the conventional technique in a cadaver study. Knee Surgery, Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006 Oct;14(10):917–21.
50. Suero EM, Sabbagh Y, Westphal R, Hawi N, Citak M, Wahl FM, et al. Effect of Medial Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy on Intraarticular Knee and Ankle Contact Pressures. 2015;(April):598–604.
51. El-Azab H, Glabgly P, Paul J, Imhoff AB, Hinterwimmer S. Patellar height and posterior tibial slope after open- and closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy: A radiological study on 100 patients. Am J Sports Med. 2010 Feb;38(2):323–9.
52. Erquicia J, Gelber PE, Perelli S, Ibañez F, Ibañez M, Pelfort X, et al. Biplane opening wedge high tibial osteotomy with a distal tuberosity osteotomy, radiological and clinical analysis with minimum follow-up of 2 years. J Exp Orthop. 2019 Feb;6(1):10.
53. Goshima K, Sawaguchi T, Shigemoto K, Iwai S, Nakanishi A, Ueoka K. Patellofemoral Osteoarthritis Progression and Alignment Changes after Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy Do Not Affect Clinical Outcomes at Mid-term Follow-up. Arthrosc – J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 2017 Oct 1;33(10):1832–9.
54. Kley K, Bin Abd Razak HR, Khakha RS, Wilson AJ, van Heerwaarden R, Ollivier M. Soft-Tissue Management and Neurovascular Protection During Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy. Arthrosc Tech. 2021 Feb;10(2):e419–22.
55. Wootton JR, Ashworth MJ, MacLaren CA. Neurological complications of high tibial osteotomy–the fibular osteotomy as a causative factor: a clinical and anatomical study. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1995 Jan;77(1):31–4.
56. Woodacre T, Ricketts M, Evans JT, Pavlou G, Schranz P, Hockings M, et al. Complications associated with opening wedge high tibial osteotomy – A review of the literature and of 15 years of experience. Knee. 2016 Mar 1;23(2):276–82.
57. Visser J, Brinkman J-M, Bleys RLAW, Castelein RM, van Heerwaarden RJ. The safety and feasibility of a less invasive distal femur closing wedge osteotomy technique: a cadaveric dissection study of the medial aspect of the distal femur. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 Jan;21(1):220–7.
58. van den Bekerom MPJ, Patt TW, Kleinhout MY, van der Vis HM, Albers GHR. Early complications after high tibial osteotomy: a comparison of two techniques. J Knee Surg. 2008 Jan;21(1):68–74.
59. Hartz C, Wischatta R, Klostermeier E, Paetzold M, Gerlach K, Pries F. Plate-related results of opening wedge high tibial osteotomy with a carbon fiber reinforced poly-ether-ether-ketone (CF-PEEK) plate fixation: A retrospective case series of 346 knees. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Dec 27;14(1).
60. Roberson TA, Momaya AM, Adams K, Long CD, Tokish JM, Wyland DJ. High Tibial Osteotomy Performed With All-PEEK Implants Demonstrates Similar Outcomes but Less Hardware Removal at Minimum 2-Year Follow-up Compared With Metal Plates. Orthop J Sport Med. 2018 Jan 2;6(3).
61. Lim JBT, Chong HC, Pang HN, Tay KJD, Chia SL, Lo NN, et al. Revision total knee arthroplasty for failed high tibial osteotomy and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty have similar patient-reported outcome measures in a two-year follow-up study. 2017;99(10).
62. Pearse AJ, Hooper GJ, Rothwell AG, Frampton C. Osteotomy and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty converted to total knee arthroplasty: data from the New Zealand Joint Registry. J Arthroplasty. 2012 Dec;27(10):1827–31.
63. Badawy M, Fenstad AM, Indrekvam K, Havelin LI, Furnes O. The risk of revision in total knee arthroplasty is not affected by previous high tibial osteotomy. Acta Orthop. 2015;86(6):734–9.


How to Cite this article: Rudraraju RT, Shatrov J, Fritsch BA| Osteotomy Complications: Prevention and Cure | Asian Journal of Arthroscopy | July-December 2021; 6(2): 46-53.


(Abstract Text HTML)      (Download PDF)


Volume 6 | Issue 2 | July-December 2021 | Page 39-45 | Anshu Shekhar, Puneeth K, Sachin Tapasvi

DOI:10.13107/aja.2021.v06i02.033


Author: Anshu Shekhar [1], Puneeth K [2], Sachin Tapasvi [2]

[1] Sushrut OrthoPlastic Clinic, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India.
[2] The Orthopaedic Speciality Clinic, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

Address of Correspondence:

Dr. Anshu Shekhar,
Consultant, Sushrut OrthoPlastic Clinic, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India.
E-mail: dr.anshushekhar@gmail.com


Abstract

The anatomy proximal tibia is such that the anterior part is higher than the posterior, both medially and laterally, which causes a natural posterior tibial slope (PTS). The ‘normal range’ of this slope is variable across geography, ethnicity and gender. The morphology of the slope has profound impact on knee biomechanics, especially with respect to the anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments. A high slope increases forces across the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), while the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) function is compromised when the slope is flat or reversed (sloping anteriorly). A flat or reversed slope also contributes to the ‘bony’ component of a genu recurvatum deformity, which can become symptomatic. A sagittal tibial osteotomy (STO) is one in which the PTS is altered without changing the coronal plane alignment. When the slope is reduced, it is known as an extension STO and when the slope is increased, it is known as a flexion STO. This review describes the biomechanics of the PTS; the planning, indications, technique and complications of a STO and discusses some case examples.

Keywords: Posterior tibial slope, Osteotomy, Sagittal plane deformity, Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, Genu recurvatum


References

1. Hashemi J, Chandrashekar N, Gill B, et al. The geometry of the tibial plateau and its influence on the biomechanics of the tibiofemoral joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(12):2724-2734. doi:10.2106/JBJS.G.01358

2. Dejour H, Bonnin M. Tibial translation after anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Two radiological tests compared. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994;76(5):745-749.

3. Genin P, Weill G, Julliard R. La pente tibiale. Proposition pour une méthode de mesure [The tibial slope. Proposal for a measurement method]. J Radiol. 1993;74(1):27-33.

4. Pangaud C, Laumonerie P, Dagneaux L, LiArno S, Wellings P, Faizan A, Sharma A, Ollivier M. Measurement of the Posterior Tibial Slope Depends on Ethnicity, Sex, and Lower Limb Alignment: A Computed Tomography Analysis of 378 Healthy Participants. Orthop J Sports Med. 2020 Jan 24;8(1):2325967119895258.

5. Weinberg DS, Williamson DF, Gebhart JJ, Knapik DM, Voos JE. Differences in Medial and Lateral Posterior Tibial Slope: An Osteological Review of 1090 Tibiae Comparing Age, Sex, and Race. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jan;45(1):106-113. doi: 10.1177/0363546516662449. Epub 2016 Oct 1. PMID: 27587744.

6. Aljuhani WS, Qasim SS, Alrasheed A, Altwalah J, Alsalman MJ. The effect of gender, age, and body mass index on the medial and lateral posterior tibial slopes: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2021 Apr 8;33(1):12.

7. Zhang K, Han Q, Wang H, Yang K, Chen B, Zhang Y, Zhang S, Wang J, Chu H. Measurement of proximal tibial morphology in northeast Chinese population based on three-dimensional reconstruction computer tomography. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Nov;98(45):e17508.

8. Matsuda S, Miura H, Nagamine R, et al. Posterior tibial slope in the normal and varus knee. Am J Knee Surg. 1999;12(3):165-168.

9. Agneskirchner JD, Hurschler C, Stukenborg-Colsman C, Imhoff AB, Lobenhoffer P. Effect of high tibial flexion osteotomy on cartilage pressure and joint kinematics: a biomechanical study in human cadaveric knees. Winner of the AGA-DonJoy Award 2004. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2004;124(9):575-584. doi:10.1007/s00402-004-0728-8

10. Pandy MG, Shelburne KB. Dependence of cruciate-ligament loading on muscle forces and external load. J Biomech. 1997;30(10):1015-1024. doi:10.1016/s0021-9290(97)00070-5

11. Shelburne KB, Pandy MG. A musculoskeletal model of the knee for evaluating ligament forces during isometric contractions. J Biomech. 1997;30(2):163-176. doi:10.1016/s0021-9290(96)00119-4

12. Giffin JR, Vogrin TM, Zantop T, Woo SL, Harner CD. Effects of increasing tibial slope on the biomechanics of the knee. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32(2):376-382. doi:10.1177/0363546503258880

13. Giffin JR, Stabile KJ, Zantop T, Vogrin TM, Woo SL, Harner CD. Importance of tibial slope for stability of the posterior cruciate ligament deficient knee. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(9):1443-1449. doi:10.1177/0363546507304665

14. Bernhardson AS, Aman ZS, Dornan GJ, Kemler BR, Storaci HW, Brady AW, Nakama GY, LaPrade RF. Tibial Slope and Its Effect on Force in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Grafts: Anterior Cruciate Ligament Force Increases Linearly as Posterior Tibial Slope Increases. Am J Sports Med. 2019 Feb;47(2):296-302.

15. McLean SG, Oh YK, Palmer ML, Lucey SM, Lucarelli DG, Ashton-Miller JA, Wojtys EM. The relationship between anterior tibial acceleration, tibial slope, and ACL strain during a simulated jump landing task. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Jul 20;93(14):1310-7.

16. Yamaguchi KT, Cheung EC, Markolf KL, Boguszewski DV, Mathew J, Lama CJ, McAllister DR, Petrigliano FA. Effects of Anterior Closing Wedge Tibial Osteotomy on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Force and Knee Kinematics. Am J Sports Med. 2018 Feb;46(2):370-377.

17. Imhoff FB, Mehl J, Comer BJ, Obopilwe E, Cote MP, Feucht MJ, Wylie JD, Imhoff AB, Arciero RA, Beitzel K. Slope-reducing tibial osteotomy decreases ACL-graft forces and anterior tibial translation under axial load. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Oct;27(10):3381-3389.

18. Bowen JR, Morley DC, McInerny V, MacEwen GD. Treatment of genu recurvatum by proximal tibial closing-wedge/anterior displacement osteotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983;(179):194-199.

19. Moroni A, Pezzuto V, Pompili M, Zinghi G. Proximal osteotomy of the tibia for the treatment of genu recurvatum in adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74(4):577-586.

20. Utzschneider S, Goettinger M, Weber P, et al. Development and validation of a new method for the radiologic measurement of the tibial slope. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011;19:1643-1648.

21. Hudek R, Schmutz S, Regenfelder F, Fuchs B, Koch PP. Novel measurement technique of the tibial slope on conventional MRI. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Aug;467(8):2066-72.

22. Luceri F, Basilico M, Batailler C, et al. Effects of sagittal tibial osteotomy on frontal alignment of the knee and patellar height. Int Orthop. 2020;44(11):2291-2298. doi:10.1007/s00264-020-04580-3

23. Webb JM, Salmon LJ, Leclerc E, Pinczewski LA, Roe JP. Posterior tibial slope and further anterior cruciate ligament injuries in the anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed patient. Am J Sports Med. 2013 Dec;41(12):2800-4.

24. Salmon LJ, Heath E, Akrawi H, Roe JP, Linklater J, Pinczewski LA. 20-Year Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Hamstring Tendon Autograft: The Catastrophic Effect of Age and Posterior Tibial Slope. Am J Sports Med. 2018 Mar;46(3):531-543.

25. Lee CC, Youm YS, Cho SD, Jung SH, Bae MH, Park SJ, Kim HW. Does Posterior Tibial Slope Affect Graft Rupture Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction? Arthroscopy. 2018 Jul;34(7):2152-2155. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.01.058. Epub 2018 Mar 9. PMID: 29530354.

26. Ahmed I, Salmon L, Roe J, Pinczewski L. The long-term clinical and radiological outcomes in patients who suffer recurrent injuries to the anterior cruciate ligament after reconstruction. Bone Joint J. 2017 Mar;99-B(3):337-343. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B3.37863. PMID: 28249973.

27. Friedmann, S., Agneskirchner, J. & Lobenhoffer, P. Extendierende und flektierende Tibiakopfosteotomien. Arthroskopie 21, 30–38 (2008).


How to Cite this article: Shekhar A, Puneeth K, Tapasvi S | Sagittal tibial osteotomy | Asian Journal of Arthroscopy | July-December 2021; 6(2): 39-45.


(Abstract Text HTML)      (Download PDF)


Volume 6 | Issue 2 | July-December 2021 | Page 34-38 | Matthieu Ollivier, Christophe Jacquet, Grégoire Micicoi

DOI:10.13107/aja.2021.v06i02.032


Author: Matthieu Ollivier [1], Christophe Jacquet [2], Grégoire Micicoi [3]

[1] Institute of Movement and Locomotion Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, St Marguerite Hospital, 270 Boulevard Sainte Marguerite, BP 29 13274 Marseille, France.
[2] Aix Marseille University, APHM, CNRS, ISM, Sainte-Marguerite Hospital, Institute for Locomotion, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Marseille, France.
[3] iULS-University Institute for Locomotion and Sports, Pasteur 2 Hospital, University Côte d’Azur, Nice, France

Address of Correspondence:

Dr. Matthieu Ollivier,
Institute of Movement and Locomotion Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, St Marguerite Hospital, 270 Boulevard Sainte Marguerite, BP 29 13274 Marseille, France.
E-mail: matthieu.ollivier@ap-hm.fr


Abstract

Knee osteotomy is a successful operation which allow restoration of function, the preoperative planning and the achievement of the target correction during the surgery constitute critical steps which may affect the clinical results. With conventional techniques, the target correction may be difficult to obtain with substantial under- or overcorrection, then the preoperative planning should not only take into account the global alignment but also the segmental deformities with the proximal tibial deformity, the distal femoral deformity and the intra-articular deformity requiring an individualised approach to obtain the intended correction. The recent introduction of patient-specific cutting guides (PSCGs) based on preoperative CT-scan templating now offers the possibility of providing an instrumentation specific to each patient allowing to control exactly the correction in the different planes. The recent expansion in the use of PSCGs within the surgical community allows us to explore all its fields of application, from the simplest cases to the most complex cases. The accuracy of these guides allows in practice a great reliability for which the clinical impact must be known. However, we must keep in mind that the surgeon makes the final decision on target correction and this, whatever the level of accuracy of the tool used which involves that errors can occur in the event of poor preoperative analysis. The advantages and disadvantages of PSCGs require special consideration to justify their use.
Keywords: Knee osteotomy, Patient-specific cutting guide, Accuracy, Individualised approach, Correction


References

1. Arnal-Burró J, Pérez-Mañanes R, Gallo-Del-Valle E, Igualada-Blazquez C, Cuervas-Mons M, Vaquero-Martín J (2017) Three dimensional-printed patient-specific cutting guides for femoral varization osteotomy: Do it yourself. Knee 24:1359–1368
2. Bae DK, Song SJ, Yoon KH (2009) Closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy using computer-assisted surgery compared to the conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91:1164–1171
3. Bardot L-P, Micicoi G, Favreau H, Zeman P, Khakha R, Ehlinger M, Ollivier M (2021) Global varus malalignment increase from double-leg to single-leg stance due to intra-articular changes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
4. Bastard C, Mirouse G, Potage D, Silbert H, Roubineau F, Hernigou P, Flouzat-Lachaniette C-H (2017) Return to sports and quality of life after high tibial osteotomy in patients under 60 years of age. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 103:1189–1191
5. Bonutti P, Dethmers D, Stiehl JB (2008) Case report : femoral shaft fracture resulting from femoral tracker placement in navigated TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:1499–1502
6. Brouwer RW, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA, van Raaij TM, Verhaar J a. N (2006) Osteotomy for medial compartment arthritis of the knee using a closing wedge or an opening wedge controlled by a Puddu plate. A one-year randomised, controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:1454–1459
7. Chaouche S, Jacquet C, Fabre-Aubrespy M, Sharma A, Argenson J-N, Parratte S, Ollivier M (2019) Patient-specific cutting guides for open-wedge high tibial osteotomy: safety and accuracy analysis of a hundred patients continuous cohort. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 43:2757–2765
8. Coon TM (2009) Integrating robotic technology into the operating room. Am J Orthop 38:7–9
9. Corona PS, Vicente M, Tetsworth K, Glatt V (2018) Preliminary results using patient-specific 3d printed models to improve preoperative planning for correction of post-traumatic tibial deformities with circular frames. Injury 49 Suppl 2:S51–S59
10. Ekhtiari S, Haldane CE, de Sa D, Simunovic N, Musahl V, Ayeni OR (2016) Return to Work and Sport Following High Tibial Osteotomy: A Systematic Review. J Bone Joint Surg Am 98:1568–1577
11. Han S-B, In Y, Oh KJ, Song KY, Yun ST, Jang K-M (2019) Complications Associated With Medial Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy Using a Locking Plate: A Multicenter Study. J Arthroplasty 34:439–445
12. Han S-B, Kim HJ, Lee D-H (2017) Effect of Computer Navigation on Accuracy and Reliability of Limb Alignment Correction following Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy: A Meta-Analysis. BioMed Research International 2017:1–9
13. Hankemeier S, Hufner T, Wang G, Kendoff D, Zeichen J, Zheng G, Krettek C (2006) Navigated open-wedge high tibial osteotomy: advantages and disadvantages compared to the conventional technique in a cadaver study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:917–921
14. Hankemeier S, Hufner T, Wang G, Kendoff D, Zeichen J, Zheng G, Krettek C (2006) Navigated open-wedge high tibial osteotomy: advantages and disadvantages compared to the conventional technique in a cadaver study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:917–921
15. Iorio R, Pagnottelli M, Vadalà A, Giannetti S, Di Sette P, Papandrea P, Conteduca F, Ferretti A (2013) Open-wedge high tibial osteotomy: comparison between manual and computer-assisted techniques. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:113–119
16. Jacquet C, Chan-Yu-Kin J, Sharma A, Argenson J-N, Parratte S, Ollivier M (2019) “More accurate correction using “patient-specific” cutting guides in opening wedge distal femur varization osteotomies. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 43:2285–2291
17. Jacquet C, Sharma A, Fabre M, Ehlinger M, Argenson J-N, Parratte S, Ollivier M (2019) Patient-specific high-tibial osteotomy’s ‘cutting-guides’ decrease operating time and the number of fluoroscopic images taken after a Brief Learning Curve. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
18. Kayani B, Konan S, Huq SS, Tahmassebi J, Haddad FS (2018) Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty has a learning curve of seven cases for integration into the surgical workflow but no learning curve effect for accuracy of implant positioning. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
19. Marti CB, Gautier E, Wachtl SW, Jakob RP (2004) Accuracy of frontal and sagittal plane correction in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Arthroscopy 20:366–372
20. Munier M, Donnez M, Ollivier M, Flecher X, Chabrand P, Argenson J-N, Parratte S (2017) Can three-dimensional patient-specific cutting guides be used to achieve optimal correction for high tibial osteotomy? Pilot study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 103:245–250
21. Nelissen EM, van Langelaan EJ, Nelissen RGHH (2010) Stability of medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: a failure analysis. Int Orthop 34:217–223
22. Nerhus TK, Ekeland A, Solberg G, Sivertsen EA, Madsen JE, Heir S (2017) Radiological outcomes in a randomized trial comparing opening wedge and closing wedge techniques of high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25:910–917
23. Pérez-Mañanes R, Burró JA, Manaute JR, Rodriguez FC, Martín JV (2016) 3D Surgical Printing Cutting Guides for Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy: Do It Yourself. J Knee Surg 29:690–695
24. Saragaglia D, Blaysat M, Inman D, Mercier N (2011) Outcome of opening wedge high tibial osteotomy augmented with a Biosorb® wedge and fixed with a plate and screws in 124 patients with a mean of ten years follow-up. Int Orthop 35:1151–1156
25. Saragaglia D, Chedal-Bornu B (2014) Computer-assisted osteotomy for valgus knees: medium-term results of 29 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 100:527–530
26. Saragaglia D, Roberts J (2005) Navigated osteotomies around the knee in 170 patients with osteoarthritis secondary to genu varum. Orthopedics 28:s1269-1274
27. Schröter S, Ihle C, Elson DW, Döbele S, Stöckle U, Ateschrang A (2016) Surgical accuracy in high tibial osteotomy: coronal equivalence of computer navigation and gap measurement. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24:3410–3417
28. Schröter S, Ihle C, Elson DW, Döbele S, Stöckle U, Ateschrang A (2016) Surgical accuracy in high tibial osteotomy: coronal equivalence of computer navigation and gap measurement. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24:3410–3417
29. Seo S-S, Kim O-G, Seo J-H, Kim D-H, Kim Y-G, Lee I-S (2016) Complications and Short-Term Outcomes of Medial Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy Using a Locking Plate for Medial Osteoarthritis of the Knee. Knee Surg Relat Res 28:289–296
30. Sodhi N, Khlopas A, Piuzzi NS, Sultan AA, Marchand RC, Malkani AL, Mont MA (2018) The Learning Curve Associated with Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 31:17–21
31. Van den Bempt M, Van Genechten W, Claes T, Claes S (2016) How accurately does high tibial osteotomy correct the mechanical axis of an arthritic varus knee? A systematic review. The Knee 23:925–935
32. Victor J, Premanathan A (2013) Virtual 3D planning and patient specific surgical guides for osteotomies around the knee: a feasibility and proof-of-concept study. Bone Joint J 95-B:153–158


How to Cite this article: Ollivier M, Jacquet C, Micicoi G Patient Specific | Instrumentation in Knee Osteotomies | Asian Journal of Arthroscopy | July-December 2021; 6(2): 34-38.


(Abstract Text HTML)      (Download PDF)


Volume 6 | Issue 2 | July-December 2021 | Page 27-33 | Sam Trowbridge, Hamid Razak, Dominic Davenport, Philip Pastides, Kristian Kley, Matthieu Ollivier, Raghbir S Khakha, Adrian J Wilson

DOI:10.13107/aja.2021.v06i02.031


Author: Sam Trowbridge [1], Hamid Razak [2, 3], Dominic Davenport [4], Philip Pastides [1], Kristian Kley [7], Matthieu Ollivier [5, 6], Raghbir S Khakha [1], Adrian J Wilson [7]

[1] Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
[2] Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore 544886.
[3] SingHealth Duke-NUS Musculoskeletal Sciences Academic Clinical Programme, 20 College Road, Academia Level 4, Singapore 1698.
[4] Consultant Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgeon, Princess Royal University Hospital, Bromley, London.
[5] Institute of movement and locomotion Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, St Marguerite Hospital, 270 Boulevard Sainte Marguerite, BP 29 13274 Marseille, France,
[6] Aix Marseille Univ, APHM, CNRS, ISM, Sainte-Marguerite Hospital, Institute for Locomotion, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Marseille, France.
[7] Harley Street Specialist Hospital, 18-22 Queen Anne Street, London W1G 8HU.

Address of Correspondence:

Dr. Raghbir S Khakha,
Consultant, Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
E-mail: raghbir.khakha@gmail.com


Abstract

High tibial osteotomy (HTO) has been a well accepted surgical procedure for knees with varus knee osteoarthritis. It is an excellent option for patients who are younger and have higher functional demands. However, correction of a severe varus knee by isolated (HTO) would require a significant opening which will invariably lead to joint line obliquity ( JLO) and increase the risk of complications such as hinge fractures. As such, double level osteotomy (DLO) consisting of a HTO and distal femoral osteotomy (DFO) has been purported as the preferred joint preserving procedure in patients with severe varus deformity. DLO is able to restore the mechanical alignment of the limb without causing JLO. In this narrative review, we explore the pathomechanics of varus osteoarthritis, surgical considerations for DLO planning, indications, outcomes and complications of DLO. We have also presented our preferred approach for DLO.


References

1. Bergmann G, Deuretzbacher G, Heller M, Graichen F, Rohlmann A, Strauss J, et al. Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. J Biomech. 2001;34(7):859-71.
2. Paley D, Herzenberg JE, Tetsworth K, McKie J, Bhave A. Deformity planning for frontal and sagittal plane corrective osteotomies. Orthop Clin North Am. 1994;25(3):425-65.
3. Shelburne KB, Torry MR, Pandy MG. Muscle, ligament, and joint-contact forces at the knee during walking. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37(11):1948-56.
4. Fujisawa Y, Masuhara K, Shiomi S. The effect of high tibial osteotomy on osteoarthritis of the knee. An arthroscopic study of 54 knee joints. Orthop Clin North Am. 1979;10(3):585-608.
5. Marti CB, Gautier E, Wachtl SW, Jakob RP. Accuracy of frontal and sagittal plane correction in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Arthroscopy. 2004;20(4):366-72.
6. Hernigou P, Medevielle D, Debeyre J, Goutallier D. Proximal tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis with varus deformity. A ten to thirteen-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987;69(3):332-54.
7. Lee SS, Lee HI, Cho ST, Cho JH. Comparison of the outcomes between two different target points after open wedge high tibial osteotomy: The Fujisawa point versus the lateral tibial spine. Knee. 2020;27(3):915-22.
8. Miniaci A, Ballmer FT, Ballmer PM, Jakob RP. Proximal tibial osteotomy. A new fixation device. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989(246):250-9.
9. Khakha RS, Bin Abd Razak HR, Kley K, van Heerwaarden R, Wilson AJ. Role of high tibial osteotomy in medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee: Indications, surgical technique and outcomes. Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma. 2021;23:101618.
10. Elson DW, Petheram TG, Dawson MJ. High reliability in digital planning of medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy, using Miniaci’s method. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23(7):2041-8.
11. Razak H, Micicoi G, Khakha RS, Ehlinger M, Faizan A, LiArno S, et al. Patients with varus knee osteoarthritis undergoing high tibial osteotomy exhibit more femoral varus but similar tibial morphology compared to non-arthritic varus knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021.
12. Kim JS, Lim JK, Choi HG, Jeong HW, Park SB, Shim SJ, et al. Excessively Increased Joint-Line Obliquity After Medial Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy Is Associated With Inferior Radiologic and Clinical Outcomes: What Is Permissible Joint-Line Obliquity. Arthroscopy. 2021.
13. Nakayama H, Schröter S, Yamamoto C, Iseki T, Kanto R, Kurosaka K, et al. Large correction in opening wedge high tibial osteotomy with resultant joint-line obliquity induces excessive shear stress on the articular cartilage. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018;26(6):1873-8.
14. Benjamin A. Double osteotomy for the painful knee in rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1969;51(4):694-9.
15. Babis GC, An KN, Chao EY, Rand JA, Sim FH. Double level osteotomy of the knee: a method to retain joint-line obliquity. Clinical results. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84(8):1380-8.
16. Schröter S, Nakayama H, Yoshiya S, Stöckle U, Ateschrang A, Gruhn J. Development of the double level osteotomy in severe varus osteoarthritis showed good outcome by preventing oblique joint line. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019;139(4):519-27.
17. Saragaglia D, Mercier N, Colle PE. Computer-assisted osteotomies for genu varum deformity: which osteotomy for which varus? Int Orthop. 2010;34(2):185-90.
18. Nakayama H, Iseki T, Kanto R, Kambara S, Kanto M, Yoshiya S, et al. Physiologic knee joint alignment and orientation can be restored by the minimally invasive double level osteotomy for osteoarthritic knees with severe varus deformity. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020;28(3):742-50.
19. Chernchujit B, Tharakulphan S, Prasetia R, Chantarapanich N, Jirawison C, Sitthiseripratip K. Preoperative planning of medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy using 3D computer-aided design weight-bearing simulated guidance: Technique and preliminary result. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2019;27(1):2309499019831455.
20. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989(248):13-4.
21. Asif S, Choon DS. Midterm results of cemented Press Fit Condylar Sigma total knee arthroplasty system. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2005;13(3):280-4.
22. Tegner Y, Lysholm J. Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985(198):43-9.
23. Mitsou A, Vallianatos P, Piskopakis N, Maheras S. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by over-the-top repair combined with popliteus tendon plasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990;72(3):398-404.


How to Cite this article: Trowbridge S, Razak A, Davenport D, Pastides P, Kley K, Ollivier M, Khakha RS, Wilson AJ Double Level Osteotomy of the Knee | for Varus Osteoarthritis | Asian Journal Arthroscopy | July-December 2021; 6(2): 27-33.


(Abstract Text HTML)      (Download PDF)


Volume 6 | Issue 2 | July-December 2021 | Page 20-26 | Parag Sancheti, Sunny Gugale, Kailash Patil, Ashok Shaym

DOI:10.13107/aja.2021.v06i02.030


Author: Parag Sancheti [1], Sunny Gugale [1], Kailash Patil [1], Ashok Shaym [1, 2]

[1] Department of Orthopaedics, Sancheti Institute for Orthopaedics & Rehabilitation & PG College, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
[2] Indian Orthopaedic Research Group, Thane, Maharashtra, India.

Address of Correspondence:

Dr. Parag Sancheti,
Dean, Professor & Chairman, Sancheti Institute for Orthopaedics & Rehabilitation & PG College, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: sanchetipk@gmail.com


Abstract

In the era of Joint replacement surgery, Medial High Tibial Osteotomy is a time tested and successful surgical procedure for treatment of mild to moderate knee osteoarthritis. The success of this procedure lies in proper patient selection, an excellent surgical technique, a rigid internal fixation and early rehabilitation. There are a lots of research articles published in literature, many systematic reviews and meta-analysis on this specific topic. In this review article we discuss mainly the recent trends in the medial open wedge osteotomy for treatment of knee osteoarthritis.

Keywords: MOWHTO, Osteoarthritis, Osteotomy, Surgical treatment


References

1. Sabzevari S, Ebrahimpour A, Roudi MK, Kachooei AR. High Tibial Osteotomy: A Systematic Review and Current Concept. NUMBER. 2016;4(3):9.
2. Murray R, Winkler PW, Shaikh HS, Musahl V. High Tibial Osteotomy for Varus Deformity of the Knee. JAAOS Glob Res Rev [Internet]. 2021 Jul [cited 2022 Jan 26];5(7). Available from: https://journals.lww.com/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00141
3. Choi HG, Kang YS, Kim JS, Lee HS, Lee YS. Meniscal and Cartilage Changes on Serial MRI After Medial Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Dec 1;9(12):232596712110479.
4. Lee DC, Byun SJ. High Tibial Osteotomy. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2012 Jun;24(2):61–9.
5. Ahmed El-Nahas WE-D. Comparison of Open Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy versus Unicondylar Knee Replacement for Medial Knee Osteoarthritis. Orthop Rheumatol Open Access J [Internet]. 2017 Feb 23 [cited 2022 Jan 26];5(1). Available from: https://juniperpublishers.com/oroaj/OROAJ.MS.ID.555651.php
6. Elyasi E, Cavalié G, Perrier A, Graff W, Payan Y. A Systematic Review on Selected Complications of Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy from Clinical and Biomechanical Perspectives. Saarakkala S, editor. Appl Bionics Biomech. 2021 Oct 31;2021:1–14.
7. Duan D, Cao Y, Li R, Wang G, Zhang Y, Xiang K, et al. Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy with Combined Use of Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Plates and Taylor Spatial Frame for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis. Zou J, editor. Pain Res Manag. 2021 Dec 1;2021:1–6.
8. Brinkman J-M, Lobenhoffer P, Agneskirchner JD, Staubli AE, Wymenga AB, van Heerwaarden RJ. Osteotomies around the knee: patient selection, stability of fixation and bone healing in high tibial osteotomies. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Dec;90(12):1548–57.
9. Elyasi E, Cavalié G, Perrier A, Graff W, Payan Y. A Systematic Review on Selected Complications of Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy from Clinical and Biomechanical Perspectives. Saarakkala S, editor. Appl Bionics Biomech. 2021 Oct 31;2021:1–14.
10. Herbst M, Ahrend M-D, Grünwald L, Fischer C, Schröter S, Ihle C. Overweight patients benefit from high tibial osteotomy to the same extent as patients with normal weights but show inferior mid-term results. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc [Internet]. 2021 Feb 11 [cited 2022 Jan 26]; Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00167-021-06457-3
11. Chiba K, Yonekura A, Miyamoto T, Osaki M, Chiba G. Tibial condylar valgus osteotomy (TCVO) for osteoarthritis of the knee: 5-year clinical and radiological results. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2017 Mar;137(3):303–10.
12. Caton-Deschamps index (knee) | Radiology Reference Article | Radiopaedia.org [Internet]. [cited 2022 Jan 26]. Available from: https://radiopaedia.org/articles/caton-deschamps-index-knee
13. Atamaz F, Aydogdu, Hepguler S, Sur H. Evaluation of the knee with magnetic resonance imaging prior to high tibial osteotomy: is it useful? is it necessary in routine practice? Orthop Proc. 2006 Mar 1;88-B(SUPP_I):102–102.
14. Vaishya R, Bijukchhe AR, Agarwal AK, Vijay V. A critical appraisal of medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy for knee osteoarthritis. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2018 Oct;9(4):300–6.
15. Yin Y, Li S, Zhang R, Guo J, Hou Z, Zhang Y. What is the relationship between the “Fujisawa point” and postoperative knee valgus angle? A theoretical, computer-based study. The Knee. 2020 Jan 1;27(1):183–91.
16. Peng H, Ou A, Huang X, Wang C, Wang L, Yu T, et al. Osteotomy Around the Knee: The Surgical Treatment of Osteoarthritis. Orthop Surg. 2021 Jul;13(5):1465–73.
17. Chung JH, Choi CH, Kim S-H, Kim S-J, Lee S-K, Jung M. Effect of the Osteotomy Inclination Angle in the Sagittal Plane on the Posterior Tibial Slope of the Tibiofemoral Joint in Medial Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy: Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Analysis. J Clin Med. 2021 Sep 21;10(18):4272.
18. Elson DW, Petheram TG, Dawson MJ. High reliability in digital planning of medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy, using Miniaci’s method. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Jul 1;23(7):2041–8.
19. Yoon S-D, Zhang G, Kim H-J, Lee B-J, Kyung H-S. Comparison of Cable Method and Miniaci Method Using Picture Archiving and Communication System in Preoperative Planning for Open Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2016 Dec;28(4):283–8.
20. Yoo M-J, Shin Y-E. Open Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy and Combined Arthroscopic Surgery in Severe Medial Osteoarthritis and Varus Malalignment: Minimum 5-Year Results. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2016 Dec;28(4):270–6.
21. Heinz T, Reppenhagen S, Wagenbrenner M, Horas K, Ohlmeier M, Schäfer T, et al. Focal cartilage defects of the lateral compartment do influence the outcome after high tibial valgus osteotomy. SICOT-J. 2021;7:44.
22. Lee S-J, Kim J-H, Baek E, Ryu H-S, Han D, Choi W. Incidence and Factors Affecting the Occurrence of Lateral Hinge Fracture After Medial Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Oct 1;9(10):232596712110353.
23. Staubli AE, Jacob HAC. Evolution of open-wedge high-tibial osteotomy: experience with a special angular stable device for internal fixation without interposition material. Int Orthop. 2010 Feb;34(2):167–72.
24. Onodera J, Kondo E, Omizu N, Ueda D, Yagi T, Yasuda K. Beta-tricalcium phosphate shows superior absorption rate and osteoconductivity compared to hydroxyapatite in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Nov 1;22(11):2763–70.
25. Gaasbeek RDA, Sonneveld H, van Heerwaarden RJ, Jacobs WCH, Wymenga AB. Distal tuberosity osteotomy in open wedge high tibial osteotomy can prevent patella infera: a new technique. The Knee. 2004 Dec 1;11(6):457–61.
26. Song SJ, Bae DK, Kim KI, Lee CH. Conversion Total Knee Arthroplasty after Failed High Tibial Osteotomy. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2016 Jun 30;28(2):89–98.
27. Han JH, Kim HJ, Song JG, Yang JH, Bhandare NN, Fernandez AR, et al. Is Bone Grafting Necessary in Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy? A Meta-Analysis of Radiological Outcomes. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2015 Dec 30;27(4):207–20.
28. Agneskirchner JD, Hurschler C, Wrann CD, Lobenhoffer P. The effects of valgus medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy on articular cartilage pressure of the knee: a biomechanical study. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg Off Publ Arthrosc Assoc N Am Int Arthrosc Assoc. 2007 Aug;23(8):852–61.
29. Hartz C, Wischatta R, Klostermeier E, Paetzold M, Gerlach K, Pries F. Plate-related results of opening wedge high tibial osteotomy with a carbon fiber reinforced poly-ether-ether-ketone (CF-PEEK) plate fixation: a retrospective case series of 346 knees. J Orthop Surg. 2019 Dec 27;14(1):466.
30. Roberson TA, Momaya AM, Adams K, Long CD, Tokish JM, Wyland DJ. High Tibial Osteotomy Performed With All-PEEK Implants Demonstrates Similar Outcomes but Less Hardware Removal at Minimum 2-Year Follow-up Compared With Metal Plates. Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 Mar 12;6(3):2325967117749584.
31. Kyun-Ho S, Hyun-Jae R, Ki-Mo J, Seung-Beom H. Effect of concurrent repair of medial meniscal posterior root tears during high tibial osteotomy for medial osteoarthritis during short-term follow-up: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Dec;22(1):623.
32. Koshino T, Yoshida T, Ara Y, Saito I, Saito T. Fifteen to twenty-eight years’ follow-up results of high tibial valgus osteotomy for osteoarthritic knee. The Knee. 2004 Dec;11(6):439–44.
33. Coventry MB. Upper Tibial Osteotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984 Feb;182:46–52.
34. Schallberger A, Jacobi M, Wahl P, Maestretti G, Jakob RP. High tibial valgus osteotomy in unicompartmental medial osteoarthritis of the knee: a retrospective follow-up study over 13-21 years. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Off J ESSKA. 2011 Jan;19(1):122–7.
35. Giuseffi SA, Replogle WH, Shelton WR. Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy: Review of 100 Consecutive Cases. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg Off Publ Arthrosc Assoc N Am Int Arthrosc Assoc. 2015 Nov;31(11):2128–37.
36. Han JH, Kim HJ, Song JG, Yang JH, Nakamura R, Shah D, et al. Locking plate versus non-locking plate in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy: a meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Mar;25(3):808–16.
37. Lee S-H, Seo H-Y, Kim H-R, Song E-K, Seon J-K. Older age increases the risk of revision and perioperative complications after high tibial osteotomy for unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis. Sci Rep. 2021 Dec;11(1):24340.
38. Bonasia D, Dettoni F, Sito G, Blonna D, Marmotti A, Bruzzone M, et al. Medial Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy for Medial Compartment Overload/Arthritis in the Varus Knee. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Jan 21;42.
39. LOIA MC, VANNI S, ROSSO F, BONASIA DE, BRUZZONE M, DETTONI F, et al. High tibial osteotomy in varus knees: indications and limits. Joints. 2016 Aug 18;4(2):98–110.
40. Bode G, Heyden J, Pestka J, Schmal H, Salzmann G, Südkamp N, et al. Prospective 5-year survival rate data following open-wedge valgus high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Off J ESSKA. 2013 Nov 19;23.


How to Cite this article: Sancheti P, Gugale S, Patil K, Shaym A | Opening wedge high tibial osteotomy | Asian Journal Arthroscopy | July-December 2021; 6(2): 20-26.


(Abstract Text HTML)      (Download PDF)


Volume 6 | Issue 2 | July-December 2021 | Page 12-19 | Nicolaas C. Budhiparama, Dwikora N. Utomo, Kukuh D. Hernugrahanto

DOI:10.13107/aja.2021.v06i02.029


Author: Nicolaas C. Budhiparama [1, 2, 3], Dwikora N. Utomo [4], Kukuh D. Hernugrahanto [4, 5]

[1] Nicolaas Institute of Constructive Orthopaedic Research and Education Foundation for Arthroplasty and Sports Medicine, Jakarta, Indonesia.
[2] Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
[3] Department of Vocational Studies, University Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
[4] Department of Orthopedic & Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, University Airlangga, Indonesia.
[5] Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia.

Address of Correspondence:
Dr. Nicolaas C. Budhiparama,
Nicolaas Institute of Constructive Orthopaedic Research and Education Foundation for Arthroplasty and Sports Medicine, Jakarta, Indonesia.
E-mail: n.c.budhiparama@gmail.com


Abstract

The high tibial osteotomy (HTO) is one attainable management of varus knee osteoarthritis. Particularly aimed at the young and active patient population. This procedure can alleviate the symptoms and restore alignment, which may significantly defer the requirement for knee arthroplasty in the future time. Close-wedge high tibial osteotomy (CW-HTO) is an effective option with minimal complication rate. Choosing between an open-wedge HTO, close-wedge HTO, or unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) for medial compartmental knee arthritis should be tailored to patients’ preoperative conditions and surgeons’ preferences. There is no clear evidence that one surgical method is superior to the other.

Keywords: High tibial osteotomy, Varus knee osteoarthritis, Medial compartment


References

1. Haddad FS, Bentley G. Total knee arthroplasty after high tibial osteotomy: a medium-term review. J Arthroplasty. 2000;15(5):597–603.
2. Yadav VP, Juyal A, Sharma S. Evaluation of lateral closed wedge high tibial osteotomy for medial compartment osteoarthritis. Bangladesh J Med Sci. 2015;14(4):389–92.
3. Hoell S, Suttmoeller J, Stoll V, Fuchs S, Gosheger G. The high tibial osteotomy, open versus closed wedge, a comparison of methods in 108 patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2005;125(9):638–43.
4. Jackson JP, Waugh W. Tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1961;43(4):746–51.
5. Gariepy R. Genu varum treated by high tibial osteotomy. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 1964;46:783–4.
6. Coventry MB. Osteotomy of the upper portion of the tibia for degenerative arthritis of the knee. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 1965;47(5):984–90.
7. Smith JO, Wilson AJ, Thomas NP. Osteotomy around the knee: evolution, principles and results. Knee Surgery, Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(1):3–22.
8. Chul Lee MD D. High tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2012;24(2):149–61.
9. Rossi R, Bonasia DE, Amendola A. The role of high tibial osteotomy in the varus knee. JAAOS-Journal Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011;19(10):590–9.
10. Staubli AE, De Simoni C, Babst R, Lobenhoffer P. TomoFix: a new LCP-concept for open wedge osteotomy of the medial proximal tibia–early results in 92 cases. Injury. 2003;34:55–62.
11. Schröter S, Lobenhoffer P, Mueller J, Ihle C, Stöckle U, Albrecht D. Changes of patella position after closed and open wedge high tibial osteotomy: review of the literature. Orthopade. 2012;41(3):186–8.
12. El-Azab H, Glabgly P, Paul J, Imhoff AB, Hinterwimmer S. Patellar height and posterior tibial slope after open-and closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy: a radiological study on 100 patients. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(2):323–9.
13. Tunggal JAW, Higgins GA, Waddell JP. Complications of closing wedge high tibial osteotomy. Int Orthop. 2010;34(2):255–61.
14. Atrey A, Morison Z, Tosounidis T, Tunggal J, Waddell JP. Complications of closing wedge high tibial osteotomies for unicompartmental osteoarthritis of the knee. Bone Joint Res. 2012;1(9):205–9.
15. Berruto M, Maione A, Tradati D, Ferrua P, Uboldi FM, Usellini E. Closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy, a reliable procedure for osteoarthritic varus knee. Knee Surgery, Sport Traumatol Arthrosc [Internet]. 2020;28(12):3955–61. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-05890-0
16. Marcheggiani Muccioli GM, Fratini S, Cammisa E, Vaccari V, Grassi A, Bragonzoni L, et al. Lateral Closing Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy for Medial Compartment Arthrosis or Overload. Clin Sports Med. 2019;38(3):375–86.
17. Hohmann E, Bryant A, Imhoff AB. The effect of closed wedge high tibial osteotomy on tibial slope: A radiographic study. Knee Surgery, Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006;14(5):454–9.
18. Duerr RA, Harangody S, Magnussen RA, Kaeding CC, Flanigan DC. Technique for Medial Closing-Wedge Proximal Tibia Osteotomy in the Valgus Knee. Arthrosc Tech. 2020;9(7):e925–33.
19. Takeuchi R, Ishikawa H, Miyasaka Y, Sasaki Y, Kuniya T, Tsukahara S. A novel closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy procedure to treat osteoarthritis of the knee: hybrid technique and rehabilitation measures. Arthrosc Tech. 2014;3(4):e431–7.
20. Mattei L, Lea S, Nicolaci G, Ferrero G, Marmotti A, Castoldi F. Closing wedge tibial osteotomy: is it an actual procedure nowadays? planning. 2017;3:6.
21. Howells NR, Salmon L, Waller A, Scanelli J, Pinczewski LA. The outcome at ten years of lateral closingwedge high tibial osteotomy: Determinants of survival and functional outcome. Bone Jt J. 2014;96B(11):1491–7.
22. Cheng X, Liu F, Xiong F, Huang Y, Paulus AC. Radiographic changes and clinical outcomes after open and closed wedge high tibial osteotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019;14(1):1–15.
23. Habib MK, Khan ZA. Radiological, functional, and anatomical outcome in patients with osteoarthritic knee undergoing high tibial osteotomy. Sicot-J. 2019;5.
24. Efe T, Ahmed G, Heyse TJ, Boudriot U, Timmesfeld N, Fuchs-Winkelmann S, et al. Closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy: Survival and risk factor analysis at long-term follow up. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011;12:12–6.
25. Ramanoudjame M, Vandenbussche E, Baring T, Solignac N, Augereau B, Gregory T. Fibular nonunion after closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2012;98(8):863–7.
26. Kim J-H, Kim H-J, Lee D-H. Survival of opening versus closing wedge high tibial osteotomy: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1–7.
27. Deng Y-J, Yuan Y, Ren Y-M, Li Q, Wang D, Yang Y, et al. Differences between open-wedge versus closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy on clinical and radiological outcomes and adverse events. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2018;11(5):4371–88.
28. Dettoni F, Bonasia DE, Castoldi F, Bruzzone M, Blonna D, Rossi R. High tibial osteotomy versus unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for medial compartment arthrosis of the knee: a review of the literature. Iowa Orthop J. 2010;30:131.
29. Santoso MB, Wu L. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, is it superior to high tibial osteotomy in treating unicompartmental osteoarthritis? A meta-analysis and systemic review. J Orthop Surg Res. 2017;12(1):1–10.
30. Adravanti P, Budhiparama NC, Berend KR, Thienpont E. ACL-deficient knee and unicompartmental OA: state of the art. J ISAKOS. June, 2017
31. Thienpont E, Budhiparama NC. Current expert opinions about unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Proceedings for the Partial Knee Meeting. January, 2017.


How to Cite this article: Budhiparama NC, Utomo DN, Hernugrahanto KD | Lateral Closing-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy in Unicompartmental Medial Knee Arthritis | Asian Journal of Arthroscopy | July- December 2021; 6(2): 12-19.


(Abstract Text HTML)      (Download PDF)


Volume 6 | Issue 2 | July-December 2021 | Page 08-11 | Hamid Razak, Kristian Kley
DOI:10.13107/aja.2021.v06i02.028


Author: Hamid Razak [1, 2], Kristian Kley [3, 4]

[1] SingHealth Duke-NUS Musculoskeletal Sciences Academic Clinical Programme 20 College Road, Academia Level 4, Singapore 169865.
[2] Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital 110 Sengkang East Way, Singapore 544886.
[3] London Osteotomy Centre, Harley Street Specialist Hospital, 18-22 Queen Anne Street, London.
[4] Orthoprofis Hannover, Luisenstraße 10-11, 30159, Hannover, Germany.

Address of Correspondence:
Dr. Hamid Razak,
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital 110 Sengkang East Way, Singapore 544886.
E-mail: hamidrazak@gmail.com


Abstract

High tibial osteotomy (HTO) has been the workhorse joint preserving surgery for medial knee osteoarthritis (KOA) with varus deformity. Its importance as a surgical option has been amplified in recent years due to the greater incidence of KOA in young active patients. HTO procedures produce the best outcomes and the highest predictability when executed according to the pre-ordained surgical plan. Planning for an HTO is a mandatory and critical step. Failure to plan adequately leads to poor outcomes following HTO. Methods of planning can be broadly classified into traditional pen-and-paper planning as well as digital planning with software. Both are acceptable methods with their own merits but their utilization may be influenced by surgeon preferences, accessibility, case load and experience.
keywords: Varus knee osteoarthritis, Knee preservation, High tibial osteotomy, Preoperative planning, Surgical planning


References

1. Smith JO, Wilson AJ, Thomas NP. Osteotomy around the knee: evolution, principles and results. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(1):3-22.2. Niinimäki TT, Eskelinen A, Ohtonen P, Junnila M, Leppilahti J. Incidence of osteotomies around the knee for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a 22-year population-based study. Int Orthop. 2012;36(7):1399-402.
3. Bayliss LE, Culliford D, Monk AP, Glyn-Jones S, Prieto-Alhambra D, Judge A, et al. The effect of patient age at intervention on risk of implant revision after total replacement of the hip or knee: a population-based cohort study. Lancet. 2017;389(10077):1424-30.
4. El-Azab HM, Morgenstern M, Ahrens P, Schuster T, Imhoff AB, Lorenz SG. Limb alignment after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy and its effect on the clinical outcome. Orthopedics. 2011;34(10):e622-8.
5. Razak H, Micicoi G, Khakha RS, Ehlinger M, Faizan A, LiArno S, et al. Patients with varus knee osteoarthritis undergoing high tibial osteotomy exhibit more femoral varus but similar tibial morphology compared to non-arthritic varus knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021.
6. Engel GM, Lippert FG, 3rd. Valgus tibial osteotomy: avoiding the pitfalls. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1981(160):137-43.
7. Kettelkamp DB, Wenger DR, Chao EY, Thompson C. Results of proximal tibial osteotomy. The effects of tibiofemoral angle, stance-phase flexion-extension, and medial-plateau force. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976;58(7):952-60.
8. Tjörnstrand B, Selvik G, Egund N, Lindstrand A. Roentgen stereophotogrammetry in high tibial osteotomy for gonarthrosis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1981;99(2):73-81.
9. Majeed H. Litigations in trauma and orthopaedic surgery: analysis and outcomes of medicolegal claims during the last 10 years in the United Kingdom National Health Service. EFORT Open Rev. 2021;6(3):152-9.
10. Al Ghunimat A, Hind J, Abouelela A, Sidhu GAS, Lacon A, Ashwood N. Communication With Patients Before an Operation: Their Preferences on Method of Communication. Cureus. 2020;12(11):e11431-e.
11. Miniaci A, Ballmer FT, Ballmer PM, Jakob RP. Proximal tibial osteotomy. A new fixation device. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989(246):250-9.
12. Fick R. Handbuch der Anatomie und Mechanik der Gelenke: T. Spezielle Gelenk-und Muskelmechanik: G. Fischer; 1911.
13. Fujisawa Y, Masuhara K, Shiomi S. The effect of high tibial osteotomy on osteoarthritis of the knee. An arthroscopic study of 54 knee joints. Orthop Clin North Am. 1979;10(3):585-608.
14. Dugdale TW, Noyes FR, Styer D. Preoperative planning for high tibial osteotomy. The effect of lateral tibiofemoral separation and tibiofemoral length. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992(274):248-64.
15. Lee SS, Lee HI, Cho ST, Cho JH. Comparison of the outcomes between two different target points after open wedge high tibial osteotomy: The Fujisawa point versus the lateral tibial spine. Knee. 2020;27(3):915-22.
16. Takeuchi R, Ishikawa H, Kumagai K, Yamaguchi Y, Chiba N, Akamatsu Y, et al. Fractures around the lateral cortical hinge after a medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy: a new classification of lateral hinge fracture. Arthroscopy. 2012;28(1):85-94.
17. Jacobi M, Wahl P, Jakob RP. Avoiding intraoperative complications in open-wedge high tibial valgus osteotomy: technical advancement. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18(2):200-3.
18. Han SB, Lee DH, Shetty GM, Chae DJ, Song JG, Nha KW. A “safe zone” in medial open-wedge high tibia osteotomy to prevent lateral cortex fracture. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(1):90-5.
19. Nakamura R, Komatsu N, Fujita K, Kuroda K, Takahashi M, Omi R, et al. Appropriate hinge position for prevention of unstable lateral hinge fracture in open wedge high tibial osteotomy. Bone Joint J. 2017;99-b(10):1313-8.
20. Sivertsen EA, Vik J, Meland ASV, Nerhus TK. The Dugdale planning method for high tibial osteotomies underestimates the correction angle compared to the Miniaci method. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021.
21. Elson DW, Petheram TG, Dawson MJ. High reliability in digital planning of medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy, using Miniaci’s method. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23(7):2041-8.
22. Yoon SD, Zhang G, Kim HJ, Lee BJ, Kyung HS. Comparison of Cable Method and Miniaci Method Using Picture Archiving and Communication System in Preoperative Planning for Open Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2016;28(4):283-8.


How to Cite this article: Razak H, Kley K | Indications for High Tibial Osteotomy | Asian Journal of Arthroscopy | July-December 2021; 6(2): 08-11.


(Abstract Text HTML)      (Download PDF)


Click on the Page